Stablecoins have emerged as a critical bridge between traditional finance and the fast-evolving world of digital assets. Among them, USDT (Tether) stands out as the most widely used, with significant influence across global cryptocurrency markets. Despite its widespread adoption, concerns about transparency, financial integrity, and investor protection continue to grow—especially for users in regions like China, where regulatory clarity remains limited.
This article explores the risks associated with USDT, evaluates the legal and regulatory challenges surrounding its operation, and outlines how jurisdictions such as China can protect investor rights while preparing for broader stablecoin adoption in the future.
Understanding USDT and Its Market Dominance
USDT, issued by Tether Limited, is designed to maintain a 1:1 peg with the U.S. dollar, offering stability in an otherwise volatile crypto market. As of mid-2019, USDT accounted for over 80% of the total stablecoin market, with a circulating supply of approximately $3.68 billion out of a total stablecoin volume of $4.57 billion.
👉 Discover how stablecoins are reshaping digital finance today.
While its market cap may seem modest compared to major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum, USDT’s true impact lies in its liquidity and trading volume. At peak times, daily trading volumes exceeded $24 billion, making it a dominant force in price discovery and cross-market arbitrage.
This level of influence raises urgent questions: Is USDT truly backed 1:1 by dollar reserves? Who oversees its operations? And what recourse do investors have if something goes wrong?
Core Risks Associated with USDT
1. Lack of Financial Transparency
One of the most persistent criticisms of Tether is its opaque accounting practices. Unlike regulated financial institutions, Tether has not provided a comprehensive audit from a recognized accounting firm. Instead, it has relied on limited attestations from law firms, which fall short of full financial audits.
In April 2019, Tether’s Chief Legal Officer admitted that only 74% of issued USDT tokens were backed by cash or equivalent assets—a stark contradiction to its long-standing claim of full dollar backing. This revelation fueled doubts about the stability of the peg and exposed holders to potential de-pegging risks.
Moreover, in March 2019, Tether quietly updated its website to state that reserves include "fiat currency and cash equivalents," opening the door to non-cash assets such as commercial paper or loans—further undermining trust.
2. Risk of Fund Misappropriation
A major legal battle between Tether and the New York Attorney General’s Office brought another serious concern to light: the alleged misuse of funds.
In 2019, New York authorities accused Tether of covering an $850 million shortfall at Bitfinex, a cryptocurrency exchange closely linked through shared executives and operational control. The investigation revealed overlapping leadership between Tether and Bitfinex, raising red flags about commingling of customer funds and lack of corporate separation.
Although Tether claimed these were temporary transfers to a third party, the absence of transparent reporting makes it difficult for investors to verify such claims.
3. Regulatory and Jurisdictional Gaps
Tether is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, while Bitfinex operates from Hong Kong—jurisdictions with minimal oversight over digital asset issuers. This strategic placement allows Tether to operate outside the reach of strict financial regulators like the U.S. SEC or FDIC.
However, under U.S. “long-arm” jurisdiction principles, foreign entities can still be held accountable if their actions affect American citizens. The ongoing litigation in New York highlights this tension—but also underscores a broader issue: investors in countries like China lack equivalent enforcement mechanisms.
For Chinese users—who reportedly hold over 60% of all USDT—this creates a dangerous imbalance. They bear disproportionate risk without access to legal remedies or regulatory safeguards.
Investor Rights at Risk
Despite being digital assets, stablecoins like USDT function as de facto financial instruments. Therefore, they should be subject to basic consumer protections under frameworks like China’s Guiding Opinions on Financial Consumer Rights Protection.
Let’s examine three key rights currently under threat:
🔹 Right to Asset Security
Financial institutions must safeguard customer funds and avoid commingling with corporate assets. Yet Tether’s alleged transfer of $850 million to Bitfinex suggests a breach of this principle. If proven, such actions directly endanger the property safety rights of USDT holders.
Additionally, changing reserve policies without clear notice violates expectations of stability—a core promise of any “stable” currency.
🔹 Right to Informed Consent
Transparency is foundational to informed decision-making. Investors have the right to know:
- What backs their holdings?
- How reserves are managed?
- Who controls the issuing entity?
Tether’s inconsistent disclosures and lack of real-time reporting place Chinese investors at an information disadvantage—increasing vulnerability to fraud or sudden devaluations.
🔹 Right to Legal Recourse
If Tether fails to honor redemptions or misuses funds, affected users need viable legal pathways. However, due to its offshore structure:
- Filing civil suits becomes complex.
- Enforcement of judgments is uncertain.
- Cross-border investigations strain judicial resources.
Without strong international cooperation, many victims may find justice out of reach.
Legal Pathways for Chinese Jurisdiction
Despite Tether’s offshore status, China has several legal tools to assert jurisdiction and protect domestic investors.
✅ Criminal Jurisdiction
Under Article 6 of China’s Criminal Law, Chinese courts can exercise territorial jurisdiction if either the criminal act or its consequences occur within China. Given that millions of Chinese citizens hold USDT and conduct transactions via domestic networks, the “result location” criterion is likely satisfied.
Additionally, Article 8 provides for protective jurisdiction: if Tether’s actions constitute a crime punishable by more than three years’ imprisonment under Chinese law (e.g., illegal fundraising, money laundering), prosecution may proceed regardless of where the act occurred.
👉 Learn how global regulators are responding to unregulated digital assets.
✅ Civil Litigation Options
Under China’s Civil Procedure Law, foreign defendants can be sued if:
- The contract was signed or performed in China.
- The defendant has assets subject to seizure.
- The侵权行为 (torts) affect Chinese residents.
Since USDT is bought and used extensively within China through online platforms, courts could recognize:
- Contract performance in China (based on user purchases).
- Infringement results occurring domestically (when users cannot redeem value).
These grounds allow investors to file lawsuits in local courts—potentially leading to asset freezes or compensation orders.
Regulatory Recommendations
To mitigate risks and prepare for future digital currencies—including potential global stablecoins like Diem (formerly Libra)—China should consider the following measures:
1. Mandate Regular Independent Audits
Require all stablecoin issuers serving Chinese users to publish quarterly, third-party audited reports verifying reserve holdings. These should be conducted by internationally recognized accounting firms.
2. Enforce Real-Time Disclosure Standards
Establish a regulatory framework requiring transparent disclosure of:
- Reserve composition
- Redemption mechanisms
- Executive affiliations
- On-chain transaction flows
3. Strengthen International Cooperation
Collaborate with global regulators through existing channels (e.g., IOSCO, FATF) to:
- Share investigative data
- Coordinate enforcement actions
- Impose joint penalties on non-compliant issuers
Such collaboration would enhance deterrence and improve cross-border accountability.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Is USDT really backed 1:1 by U.S. dollars?
A: Not consistently. While Tether claims partial backing by cash and equivalents, independent audits are lacking. In 2019, only 74% of USDT was reportedly backed by liquid assets.
Q: Can I redeem my USDT for USD directly?
A: Individual retail users typically cannot redeem USDT directly through Tether. Most exchanges facilitate trading rather than official redemption.
Q: What happens if USDT loses its dollar peg?
A: A loss of confidence could trigger mass sell-offs, destabilizing crypto markets that rely on USDT for liquidity and pricing.
Q: Are there safer alternatives to USDT?
A: Yes. Regulated stablecoins like GUSD (Gemini Dollar) and USDC (USD Coin) undergo regular audits and comply with financial regulations—offering greater transparency.
Q: Can China ban or regulate foreign stablecoins?
A: Yes. Under existing policies like the 2017 ban on crypto trading platforms, China can restrict access to services offering USDT trading to domestic users.
Q: Should I invest in USDT?
A: For short-term trading or hedging volatility, USDT is widely accepted—but long-term holding carries counterparty risk. Diversify carefully and monitor regulatory developments.
Final Thoughts: Preparing for the Future of Digital Money
USDT exemplifies both the promise and perils of decentralized finance. While it offers unmatched liquidity and utility, its lack of oversight poses systemic risks—particularly for unsophisticated investors in emerging markets.
As global interest in stablecoins grows—driven by innovations like central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and Web3 applications—China must proactively develop a clear regulatory stance.
By enforcing transparency, protecting consumer rights, and cooperating internationally, Chinese authorities can help shape a safer digital financial ecosystem—one that balances innovation with accountability.
👉 Stay ahead in digital finance—explore secure crypto solutions now.