The world of cryptocurrency revolves around trading, but the way it's executed varies significantly across ecosystems. While centralized exchanges (CEXs) dominate liquidity and speed, decentralized exchanges (DEXs) serve as the backbone of native blockchain activity—especially in DeFi-centric chains like Ethereum and Solana.
For TON (The Open Network), rapid adoption through Telegram has created massive user momentum. However, its DEX ecosystem remains in early stages compared to more mature blockchains. To unlock true financial sovereignty and on-chain innovation, TON must evolve its decentralized trading infrastructure. But what exactly does TON’s DEX landscape need to catch up?
The State of DEXs on Ethereum and Solana
Ethereum and Solana represent two leading models for DEX development—each shaped by their network architecture, community, and use cases.
Ethereum: Depth, Diversity, and DeFi Integration
Ethereum pioneered the modern DEX era with Uniswap, introducing automated market makers (AMMs) that allow trustless token swaps. Over time, Uniswap evolved:
- V1: Basic 50/50 liquidity pools
- V2: Introduced flash swaps and enhanced routing
- V3: Enabled concentrated liquidity within custom price ranges, boosting capital efficiency for LPs
Beyond swapping, Uniswap plays a critical role in MEV resistance and on-chain price oracles. Many DeFi protocols rely on Uniswap pools as real-time data sources due to their depth and accuracy—often bypassing external oracle providers like Chainlink.
But Ethereum’s DEX strength lies not just in Uniswap. A rich ecosystem complements core functionality:
- Balancer: Offers weighted and custom liquidity pools, ideal for portfolio management and token launches
- Curve: Specializes in low-slippage stablecoin swaps, essential for yield strategies
- SushiSwap & DODO: Expand on AMM mechanics with gamified incentives and proactive market making
- 1inch, Matcha, MetaMask Swap: Aggregators that optimize trade execution across multiple DEXs
These platforms don’t just facilitate trades—they act as liquidity hubs, launchpads, and yield engines, integrating deeply with lending, derivatives, and insurance protocols.
👉 Discover how next-gen DeFi platforms are redefining trading efficiency
Solana: Speed, Simplicity, and Seamless UX
Solana’s ultra-fast throughput reshapes DEX design priorities. With sub-second finality, the distinction between CEX and DEX blurs.
Here, Jupiter leads as both a DEX aggregator and innovation lab. It supports:
- Advanced order types (e.g., Dollar-Cost Averaging via DCA)
- Integrated token launches
- Cross-pool routing optimized for low latency
Meanwhile, Meteora introduces dynamic liquidity vaults with adaptive pricing curves—giving LPs granular control over risk and returns.
Crucially, most Solana wallets natively embed swap functionality. Users rarely visit standalone DEX apps; instead, they trade directly from wallet interfaces powered by modular DeFi SDKs.
This reflects a broader trend: on high-speed chains, DEXs become backend liquidity layers, while frontends focus on seamless integration.
Where TON Stands Today
TON matches Solana in performance but diverges in design philosophy. Its integration with Telegram delivers unmatched accessibility—yet prioritizes convenience over decentralization.
Currently, popular TON-based DEXs like STON.fi and Dedust offer basic AMM functionality akin to early Uniswap versions. They support simple swaps and liquidity provision but lack advanced features such as:
- Concentrated liquidity
- Weighted or multi-token pools
- Native launchpad mechanisms
- Oracle services
- Yield-bearing asset (pToken) support
Telegram’s built-in wallet further complicates matters. While it enables frictionless stablecoin top-ups and instant swaps, these are often handled off-chain or via centralized relayers—undermining the transparency and censorship resistance expected in DeFi.
In essence, TON provides a CEX-like experience with Web3 branding, but the underlying DeFi stack remains underdeveloped.
Building the Missing Pieces: LayerPixel and the Road Ahead
To bridge this gap, new projects are emerging to enhance TON’s DeFi architecture. One standout is LayerPixel, a DeFi middleware platform incubated by TonUP (a leading TON launchpad).
Designed as a “Layer 1.5” solution, LayerPixel aims to deliver full-cycle DeFi capabilities tailored for Telegram Mini Apps:
1. PixelSwap – Next-Gen AMM
A Balancer-inspired DEX with support for:
- Custom-weight liquidity pools
- LBP (Launch Bonding Curve) for fair token distribution
- Multi-asset staking and yield compounding
This allows small GameFi projects—abundant in the TON ecosystem—to launch fairly without gas wars or price manipulation.
2. Embedded SDK for Developers
Enables any Telegram Mini App to integrate swap functionality seamlessly. Think of it as Stripe for DeFi—turning messaging bots into financial gateways.
3. Comprehensive DeFi Stack
Beyond swapping, LayerPixel plans to offer:
- On-chain price oracles derived from active pools
- Liquidity vaults with risk-managed yield strategies
- Unified wallet experiences combining trading, launching, and staking
With code already submitted for dual audits, LayerPixel could become the foundational layer for TON’s maturing DeFi ecosystem.
👉 Explore how modular DeFi infrastructures are shaping the future of trading
FAQ: Your Questions About TON’s DEX Evolution
Q: Why isn’t Telegram’s built-in swap enough for TON users?
A: While convenient, built-in swaps often rely on centralized matching engines or off-chain execution. True DeFi requires transparent, on-chain settlement to ensure security and composability.
Q: Can TON compete with Ethereum and Solana in DeFi?
A: Yes—but only if it builds native infrastructure. High user numbers give TON an edge; now it needs depth in protocol design to retain value on-chain.
Q: What makes LayerPixel different from existing DEXs?
A: It’s not just a swap platform. LayerPixel integrates launchpads, oracles, yield tools, and developer SDKs into one cohesive system—making it a potential DeFi operating system for Telegram.
Q: Are there risks in relying on projects like LayerPixel?
A: As with any early-stage protocol, smart contract risk exists. Dual audits help mitigate this, but users should always conduct due diligence before depositing funds.
Q: Will TON ever have CEX-level speed with full decentralization?
A: Technically, yes. TON’s consensus model supports high throughput. The challenge is incentivizing sufficient node decentralization while maintaining performance.
Final Thoughts: From Adoption to Innovation
TON’s growth is undeniable. With hundreds of millions of Telegram users within reach, it has the potential to onboard more people into crypto than any chain before it.
But user access is only step one. To foster lasting economic activity, TON must empower builders and traders with sophisticated tools—just as Ethereum and Solana have done.
A mature DEX ecosystem enables:
- Fairer token launches
- Efficient capital deployment
- Reliable price discovery
- Interoperable financial products
As LayerPixel and similar initiatives roll out, TON can transition from a Web2-friendly gateway to a fully-fledged Web3 financial hub.
👉 See how cutting-edge blockchain projects are transforming digital finance
The future of decentralized trading isn’t just about speed—it’s about depth, flexibility, and user empowerment. For TON, that future is within reach.